Conveyor and VeriRFP both combine questionnaire automation with buyer-facing trust workflows. Conveyor emphasizes agent-led intake, approved-knowledge citations, confidence scoring, browser-portal completion, and usage pricing. VeriRFP combines source-linked questionnaires, DDQs, RFPs, approvals, trust-center delivery, and published seat pricing. Compare the same workload in both models.
Potentially, but compare equivalent usage. Conveyor Business publicly starts at $9,600 per year with 20 questionnaire credits, 10 RFP projects, 100 Trust Center credits, and unlimited seats. VeriRFP publishes seat pricing for source-linked RFP, questionnaire, DDQ, approval, and Trust Center workflows. Model expected and peak volume, integrations, onboarding, and overages before deciding which is lower cost.
Conveyor's current product is not only a trust portal: it supports agent-led questionnaire intake, cited answers from approved knowledge, confidence scoring, reviewer tagging, portal completion, trust-center workflows, and RFP projects. VeriRFP's distinction is one governed workflow across source evidence, questionnaires, DDQs, RFPs, approvals, and buyer delivery. Price comparisons must normalize Conveyor credits and projects against VeriRFP seats and actual annual volume.
Conveyor publicly lists a free Trust Center tier without questionnaire automation. Its Business plan starts at $9,600 per year and lists unlimited seats, 100 Trust Center credits, 20 questionnaire credits, and 10 RFP projects. Enterprise pricing is custom and usage-based. Verify how a credit is consumed, whether unused credits roll over, and how overages or additional projects are priced.
For product fit, use a recent file and a real portal. Measure accepted answer coverage, citation usefulness, confidence-score calibration, reviewer corrections, portal completion, export fidelity, and the time from intake to approved return. Then compare annual cost at low, expected, and peak volume rather than treating seats or credits as directly equivalent.
Source-linked drafting inside a governed RFP, questionnaire, DDQ, approval, and buyer-delivery workflow.
Conveyor Agent can pick up requests from connected work systems, triage them, draft responses, attach completed files, and close tickets according to configured rules.
Drafts expose approved supporting evidence and confidence signals for reviewer validation.
Answers draw from approved knowledge, include source citations, use confidence scoring, and flag outdated data or exceptions for review.
Configurable SME, legal, and security stages with question ownership, approvals, and audit history.
Reviewer auto-tagging, collaboration, exception review, notifications, and an audit trail of answers, sources, and reviewers.
Built-in Trust Center with controlled evidence access, NDA gates, buyer activity, and governed response delivery.
Trust Center, clickwrap NDA, browser extension, portal completion, trust engagement analytics, and custom-domain options by plan.
RFPs, security questionnaires, DDQs, evidence reviews, buyer trust content, and controlled delivery.
Security questionnaires, RFP projects, Trust Center, sales triage, knowledge management, integrations, and customer-trust analytics.
Published per-seat and Private Edition pricing with a 30-day trial and no credit card required.
Free Trust Center; Business starts at $9,600 per year with listed credits and RFP projects; Enterprise uses custom usage pricing and volume discounts.
Quick reference for the capabilities that matter most when evaluating RFP, questionnaire, and vendor diligence platforms.
| Feature | VeriRFP | Conveyor |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence-backed AI drafting | ||
| Source citations and confidence scoring | ||
| Governed reviewer workflows | ||
| Trust Center with one-click NDA gate | ||
| AI-generated answers to buyer questions in trust center | ||
| Browser extension for buyer-portal auto-fill | ||
| SIG, CAIQ, VSAQ, DDQ, and custom-spreadsheet intake | ||
| CRM integration (Salesforce, HubSpot) | ||
| Published starting price | ||
| Unlimited seats on paid plan | Business and Enterprise | |
| 30-day trial without credit card | ||
| Self-serve signup with 30-day trial |
We reviewed the official product and pricing sources below on July 12, 2026. VeriRFP publishes this comparison and appears in it. Capabilities, packaging, limits, and prices can change, so verify the proposed plan and test both products with the same files, evidence, reviewers, and buyer portal before purchasing.
Possibly, but compare equivalent annual usage. Conveyor Business publicly starts at $9,600 per year and lists 20 questionnaire credits, 10 RFP projects, 100 Trust Center credits, and unlimited seats. VeriRFP publishes seat pricing. Model expected and peak seats, questionnaires, RFPs, integrations, onboarding, and overages before calling either option lower cost.
Both support source-grounded responses, review workflows, buyer trust content, and RFP or questionnaire work. Conveyor emphasizes agent-led intake, confidence scoring, browser portals, and usage credits. VeriRFP emphasizes one source-linked workflow across RFPs, DDQs, questionnaires, approval stages, Trust Center, and buyer delivery with seat pricing.
Yes. Conveyor's current questionnaire page says answers use approved knowledge, cite source documents, receive confidence scores, flag outdated data, auto-tag reviewers, and retain an audit trail of answers, sources, and reviewers. Test citation depth and reviewer controls against your own evidence.
Use the same checklist for every platform: trust-center access controls, approved-answer sources, reviewer ownership, questionnaire and portal formats, compliance-data connections, CRM integrations, analytics, and total annual cost. Run the same questionnaire and buyer-portal task rather than comparing vendor demos with different inputs.
VeriRFP supports PDF, DOCX, and spreadsheet intake with buyer-ready export and controlled delivery. Conveyor also supports file intake and has a browser extension for buyer portals. Teams with heavy portal volume should compare completion coverage and required manual re-entry in a pilot.
VeriRFP publishes per-seat and Private Edition prices. Conveyor publishes a free Trust Center, a Business starting price and included usage credits, while Enterprise pricing is custom. Convert both models to total annual cost using actual seats, questionnaires, RFP projects, Trust Center activity, integrations, and overages.
Median time from intake to approved buyer-ready return, separated by file and portal work.
Accepted draft coverage, unsupported claims, reviewer corrections, escalations, and approval touches.
Licenses, usage credits, overages, integrations, onboarding, support, and internal reviewer time.
Choosing between VeriRFP and Conveyor starts with understanding your team's primary bottleneck. If questionnaire turnaround time is blocking deals, measure the current average days from intake to delivery and identify where the process stalls — usually during SME routing, evidence lookup, or final legal review. Use that baseline to test whether either platform improves the bottleneck without increasing correction work or approval risk.
Run a proof-of-concept with a real questionnaire, not a demo dataset. Upload an actual SIG, CAIQ, or custom spreadsheet your team recently completed and evaluate how each platform handles parsing, evidence matching, and reviewer assignment. Pay attention to accuracy rates on your specific document types — generic benchmarks rarely reflect the complexity of your questionnaire portfolio. The platform that produces fewer manual corrections, preserves the buyer's format, and gives reviewers usable source evidence is the stronger fit for that workload.
Evaluate total cost of ownership beyond the subscription price. Factor in implementation time, evidence library population, team training, and the ongoing maintenance burden of keeping your knowledge base current. Look closely at how each platform meters usage — per-seat, per-questionnaire, per-document, or tiered usage caps all behave differently as your security team and questionnaire volume grow. Also consider whether the platform requires a compliance monitoring subscription as a prerequisite or works independently with your existing security documentation.
Migration starts with exporting your existing security documentation and prior questionnaire responses. VeriRFP's evidence ingestion pipeline accepts PDF, DOCX, and spreadsheet formats, so most content types can be evaluated without converting them to plain text first. Before switching, confirm that your current vendor export includes answer text, owners, review dates, source links, tags, and audit history; document any fields that require a controlled migration or manual validation.
After ingestion, run a parallel test: complete the same questionnaire in both platforms and compare accuracy, citation quality, and turnaround time. This gives your team a concrete comparison based on your actual workflow rather than feature lists. Keep the original buyer format, use the same approved evidence, and record accepted drafts, corrections, reviewer touches, and export defects before choosing a cutover.
VeriRFP's 30-day trial — included on every plan with no credit card required — lets you evaluate the full workflow before committing to a paid subscription. Start with a representative workspace and a small set of recent questionnaires, then measure the results against your current process and the competing product under the same conditions.
Start a free trial and run a recent questionnaire through VeriRFP using your actual evidence and reviewers.
Evaluate VeriRFP against other platforms before committing to a questionnaire workflow.